Write My Paper!

Don't Stress over approaching deadlines; an able team is ready 24/7 to assist you with your coursework assignments

We provide study solutions in all subjects. Students are matched with specialists in the various fields; Masters level graduates experts.

Place an Order today with us and live to tell a success story! No Lateness!!

Special offer! Get 20 - 30% discount on all orders - Check Coupons Section

Posted: February 2nd, 2022

Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: 1)Understand the concepts in consumer behaviour in relation to products/services assignment

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
COURSE: Bachelor of Enterprise /Bachelor of Accounting/ Bachelor of Data Know-how
Unit Code: Shopper Behaviour
Unit Title: B01CBEH209
Kind of Evaluation: Evaluation three – Particular person Essay Writing
Size/Length: 1200 phrases
Unit Studying Outcomes addressed: 1)Perceive the ideas in shopper behaviour in relation to merchandise/companies
2)Clarify concerning the shopper behaviour theories
2)Analyse the buyer behaviour buying course of
four)Differentiate the psychological and social components influencing shopper behaviour;
5)Apply the components influencing shopper behaviour on the choice making course of
Submission Date: Week 10
Evaluation Job: A person report back to be written and submitted.
Complete Mark: 100 marks
Weighting: 25%
College students are suggested that submission of an Evaluation Job previous the due date with out a formally signed accredited Task Extension Type (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink FORM – Task
Extension Utility Type – Pupil Login Required) or beforehand accredited software for different extenuating circumstances impacting course of examine, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated by deduction from the full mark.
For instance. An Evaluation Job marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for every calendar day.
Extra data, please seek advice from (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink POLICY – Evaluation Coverage &
Procedures – Pupil Login Required)
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION: Particular person Essay Writing
Essay matter: Most supermarkets in Australia (Coles, Woolworths, Aldi, and so on) provide plant-based dairy alternate options (For Instance: Soy milk, Coconut milk, Rice milk, Dairy-free ice cream, Dairy-free yogurt. Vegan bitter cream.). How can advertising and marketing managers for plant based mostly dairy alternate options implement advertising and marketing combine components to affect shopper attitudes and buy intentions in direction of these main grocery gadgets? Your reply ought to spotlight the next areas:
• Shopper on-line buy behaviour
• Shopper notion
• Shopper studying
• Shopper perspective
• Moderating results of shopper traits and situational components.
• Shopper determination making course of
The important thing sections to be included must be written in accordance with the rules for writing essays. Your essay should embrace:
• Reference from educational journals supporting your argument.
• Right argument essay construction. Discuss with the Educational Studying Expertise handout on Essay writing.
• Harvard referencing for any sources you employ. Discuss with the Educational Studying Expertise handout on Referencing.
• A minimal of 10 educational references (together with the textual content guide).
Please see Educational Studying abilities employees for help with this, or any project. They may also help you with understanding the duty, draft checking, construction, referencing and different assignment-related issues
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
The essay should be submitted on-line in Moodle. All supplies should be submitted electronically in microsoft phrase format. Different codecs (e.g., pdf or mac file) might not be readable by markers. Please bear in mind that any assessments submitted in different codecs shall be thought-about late and can lose marks till it’s introduced in MS phrase. No paper based mostly or hardcopy submission shall be accepted.
Our educational studying assist (ALS) group can be completely satisfied that will help you with understanding the duty and all different assessment-related issues. For help and to guide one-on-one assembly please e-mail considered one of our ALS coordinators (Sydney: als.syd@kent.edu.au; Melbourne: als.melb@kent.edu.au). For on-line assist and assist please click on the next hyperlink and navigate educational studying assist in moodle. Http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
Marking
Standards. Fail – Scale 1 Move – Scale 2 Credit score – Scale three Distinction – Scale four Excessive Distinction – Scale 5
Analysis
/25 Little proof of analysis. Sources are lacking, Inappropriate, poorly built-in or missing credibility. Lacks clear hyperlink of sources with essay. No in
textual content citations
A minimal of 5 educational sources. Fundamental use of sources to assist concepts, usually properly built-in, most sources are credible. Could also be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration /software. Analysis is mostly thorough. Good use of sources to assist concepts, principally properly built-in, sources are credible. Could also be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/ software. Thorough analysis is indicated. Superb use of sources to assist concepts, properly built-in, sources are credible. Could also be minor weaknesses with paraphrasing or
integration/software
. Thorough analysis is indicated. Skilled use of sources to assist concepts, properly built-in, sources are credible. Very minor, if any, weaknesses with paraphrasing or Integration/software
.
Informati on /
Content material
/25
Essay lacks coherence; matter is poorly addressed; little evaluation.
Essay is mostly coherent; matter is addressed; analyses in affordable depth with some description. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with movement. Essay is coherent and flows properly; matter is addressed fairly totally; analyses in appreciable depth. There could also be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with movement. Essay could be very coherent and flows properly; matter is addressed totally; analyses in depth. There could also be minor inconsistencies and weak point with movement. Skilled work. Essay could be very coherent and flows properly; matter is addressed totally; analyses in nice depth. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with movement.
Construction
/20 Matter, ideas and thesis will not be clear in introduction. Materials within the physique is mostly poorly sequenced. No discernible conclusion; no hyperlinks to introduction. Matter, ideas and thesis are said with some readability in introduction. Materials in physique is mostly logically sequenced; some weaknesses. Conclusion doesn’t clearly summarise essay; hyperlinks to introduction will not be clear. Matter, ideas and thesis are clearly conveyed in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises essay; could also be some weaknesses; usually clear hyperlinks to intro. Matter, ideas and thesis are clearly outlined in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; only a few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion principally successfully summarises essay; with suggestions and
clear hyperlinks to introduction. Matter, ideas are clearly outlined in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; very
minor, if any, weaknesses.
Conclusion successfully summarises essay; with suggestions and clear hyperlinks to introduction.
Languag
e/
Presenta tion
/15 Poor commonplace of writing. Phrase restrict might not be adhered to. Incorrect format (
e.g. contains Desk of contents; bullet factors; graphs and so on.) A minimal of 1000 phrases. Fundamental and sound commonplace of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Inconsistencies with the formatting. Good commonplace of writing; few errors in
punctuation, grammar and
spelling. Nearly appropriate formatting. Superb commonplace of writing; only a few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Right formatting. Skilled commonplace of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Right formatting.
Referenc
ing
/15 No referencing is clear or, if accomplished, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference listing, combined types. No in textual content citations Fundamental and sound try to reference sources; could also be some inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Reference listing is mostly full with 1 or 2 references lacking. Good try to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Few inaccuracies in reference listing and all references listed.
Superb try to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Thorough and constant reference listing and all references listed.
Skilled stage of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of favor evident. Thorough and constant reference listing and all references listed.
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content material for Evaluation Job papers ought to incorporate a proper introduction, details and conclusion.
Applicable educational writing and referencing are inevitable educational abilities that you will need to develop and show in work being introduced for evaluation. The content material of top of the range work introduced by a scholar should be totally referenced within-text citations and a Reference Listing on the finish. Kent strongly recommends you seek advice from the Educational Studying Help Workshop supplies out there on the Kent Studying Administration System (Moodle). For particulars please click on the hyperlink http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and obtain the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Web site is the placement for Workbooks and knowledge which can be introduced to Kent College students within the ALS Workshops carried out at the start of every Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimal of FIVE (5) references in work being introduced for evaluation. Except in any other case particularly instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed within the Unit Define for the particular Evaluation Job, any paper with lower than 5 (5) references could also be deemed not assembly a passable commonplace and presumably be failed.
Content material in Evaluation duties that features sources that aren’t correctly referenced in response to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” shall be penalised.
Marks shall be deducted for failure to stick to the phrase rely if that is particularly said for the Evaluation Job within the Unit Define. As a common rule there’s an allowable discretionary variance to the phrase rely in that it’s usually accepted scholar could go over or beneath by 10% than the said size.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for his or her high quality. College students ought to draw on high quality educational sources, akin to books, chapters from edited books, journals and so on. The textbook for the Unit of examine can be utilized as a reference, however not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will need to see proof scholar is able to conducting their very own analysis. Additionally, so as to assist Assessors decide a scholar’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not simply direct quotes) should embrace the particular web page quantity(s) if proven within the authentic. Earlier than making ready your Evaluation Job or personal contribution, please overview this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism by Referencing) by clicking on the next hyperlink: hyperlink:
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A seek for peer-reviewed journal articles may additionally help college students. These sort of journal articles will be positioned within the on-line journal databases and will be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, on-line dictionaries and on-line encyclopaedias are acceptable as a place to begin to achieve information a few matter, however shouldn’t be over-used – these ought to represent not more than 10% of your whole listing of references/sources. Extra data and literature can be utilized the place these are produced by official sources, akin to authorities departments, analysis institutes such because the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council (NHMRC), or worldwide organisations such because the World Well being Organisation (WHO). Reliable organisations and authorities departments produce peer reviewed experiences and articles and are subsequently very helpful and principally very present. The content material of the next hyperlink explains why it’s not acceptable to make use of non-peer reviewed web sites (Why cannot I simply Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (thanks to La Trobe
-research paper writing service

Check Price | Discount

Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Top Essay Writers

We select the finest writers to join our team. They each have expertise in specific topic fields and background in academic writing.

Affordable Prices

We offer the lowest possible pricing while still providing the best writers. Our costs are fair and reasonable compared to other writing services.

100% Plagiarism-Free

You will never receive a product that contains any plagiarism. We scan every final draft before releasing it to be delivered to a customer.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Assessment Brief Task Help, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.