Write My Paper!

Don't Stress over approaching deadlines; an able team is ready 24/7 to assist you with your coursework assignments

We provide study solutions in all subjects. Students are matched with specialists in the various fields; Masters level graduates experts.

Place an Order today with us and live to tell a success story! No Lateness!!

Special offer! Get 20 - 30% discount on all orders - Check Coupons Section

Posted: February 2nd, 2022

EXEC71-014 MANAGING RESOURCES – 182 ASSESSMENT TASK: MAJOR ASSIGNMENT Contemporary Management Control System Evaluation, Design and Justification

EXEC71-014 MANAGING RESOURCES – 182
ASSESSMENT TASK: MAJOR ASSIGNMENT
Up to date Administration Management System Analysis, Design and Justification
The first goal of this task is for college students to show and apply data of
the theories and practices required to successfully handle assets for profitable implementation
of organisational methods. Utilizing their workplace1 as the topic, college students are to plan a
modern administration management system, that comprehensively optimises the planning and
controlling of their organisation’s assets for long-term enterprise sustainability and the
achievement of the agency’s strategic aims. In doing so, college students are required to match and
distinction various administration management programs. Justification for the design of their
advisable administration management system is required.
Secondary aims are for college students to show cognitive abilities of information, understanding,
software, evaluation, synthesis, and analysis. Additional aims for this task are for
college students to show their enterprise reporting abilities, together with readability of writing, correct
grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Particulars:
• Rigorously evaluation Chapter 17 of your textual content and different materials lined on this course.
• Contemplate studying different reference materials.
• The enterprise report phrase restrict is 5,000 (+/- 10% tolerance), excluding government abstract,
contents web page, appendices, and references pages.
• Your report should be written in Phrase (don’t convert to a pdf) and uploaded to SafeAssign
or Turnitin by way of iLearn for a plagiarism test. If submission to the plagiarism checking portal
is with out issues, no additional submission of your report is required. No onerous copies are
required.
• This task is due on Sunday, 15
th July, 2018, 11:59 p.m.
• It’s price 50% of your whole grades.
• See subsequent web page for marking information.

1
In case you are not presently employed, please use the enterprise you chose for the primary task process.
2
A complete of 150 marks is feasible, and your outcomes can be weighted again to a rating out of 50.
Marking standards Poor to Common
(zero to 64%)
Passable to Good
(65 to 84%)
Excellent to Glorious
(85 – 100%)
Objective and
goal
(max marks = 5).
The report doesn’t clearly deal with
the target(s).
The aim and goal of the
report is made clear, and the report
addresses the target(s).
The aim and goal of the
report is made clear, and the report
addresses the target(s) in a
targeted and logical method.
Process completion
displays familiarity
with and
understanding of
topic content material and
supplies;
demonstrates
acceptable cognitive
abilities for this degree of
examine
(max marks = 30).
Restricted degree of cognitive abilities
demonstrated indicative of
data, understanding and
software of main theoretical
ideas, evaluation of the strengths
and limitations of main theoretical
approaches, integration of concepts and
justification of advisable
administration management system.
Good degree of cognitive abilities
demonstrated indicative of
data, understanding and
software of main theoretical
ideas, evaluation of the strengths
and limitations of main theoretical
approaches, integration of concepts and
justification of advisable
administration management system.
Excessive degree of cognitive abilities
demonstrated indicative of great
data, understanding and
software of main theoretical
ideas, acceptable evaluation of the
strengths and limitations of main
theoretical approaches, excellent
integration of concepts and justification
of advisable administration
management system.
Dialogue
(max marks = 50).
Dialogue is poorly organised and
leaves the reader questioning how the
conclusions and suggestions
have been made. Dialogue could also be
supported by appendices however the
integration is just not clear.
Dialogue is oriented to the aim,
is organised however maybe to not the
greatest impact. The dialogue gives
justification and clarification main
to conclusions, however this isn’t at all times
clear to the reader. If supported by
appendices, these are built-in into
the dialogue, although to not the most effective
extent.
Materials positioned in appendices the place
acceptable.
Dialogue is clearly oriented to the
goal. It’s organised in a
thought of, related method, and
leads the reader logically from the
findings to the conclusions. In different
phrases, the justification for
conclusions is evident. If supported by
appendices, these are successfully
built-in into the dialogue.
Demonstration of
crucial pondering abilities
(max marks = 30).
Incompletely analyses and interprets
related data; and/or
inaccurately or incompletely applies
theories in growing and justifying
suggestions or conclusions;
and/or suggestions or
conclusions will not be logical or
in line with the evaluation; and/or
doesn’t present options or
conclusions in a transparent method.
Adequately analyses and interprets
related data; and/or
satisfactorily applies acceptable
theories in growing and justifying
suggestions or conclusions;
and/or suggestions or
conclusions are logical and constant
with the evaluation; and/or gives
options or conclusions in a transparent
method.
Successfully analyses and interprets
related data; successfully
applies acceptable theories in
growing and justifying
suggestions or conclusions;
suggestions or conclusions are
insightful, coherent, properly supported,
and logically constant.
Written
communication abilities
(max marks = 20)
Shows insufficient organisation
and/or improvement of concepts making
the report tough to comply with; the
report reveals a number of errors in
grammar, sentence construction, and/or
spelling; unacceptable writing abilities
(e.g., weaknesses in language facility
and mechanics) hinder readability.
Excessively restricted or inappropriate or
repetitive vocabulary. Misuses
discipline-specific terminology. Fundamental
level and/or argument
confused/unclear. Irrelevant
data, no transition between
concepts.
Passable organisation and
improvement of concepts, the report is
readable and straightforward to comply with with solely
a couple of lapses; makes use of good language
conventions and mechanics with a
few minor errors in spelling,
grammar, sentence construction, and/or
punctuation. Usually acceptable
vocabulary; not overly repetitive.
Usually makes use of appropriate phrase alternative
and discipline-specific terminology.
Argument fairly clear;
often misses the purpose however
solutions the query; not overelaborate
or over-complicated.
Efficient organisation and
improvement of concepts, readability is
enhanced by facility in language use,
glorious mechanics, and syntactic
selection; makes use of language conventions
successfully (e.g., spelling, punctuation,
sentence construction, paragraphing,
grammar, and so on.). Extremely acceptable,
properly chosen, exact and different
vocabulary. Constantly makes use of appropriate
phrase alternative and discipline-specific
terminology. Argument successfully
and effectively conveyed; extremely
targeted on the query; simply
understood.
Formal construction and
presentation
(max marks = 10).
Key parts of the enterprise report
will not be offered and/or offered
with errors evident. General
presentation of the doc is just not
to an expert customary.
All required parts of a enterprise
report are current and accomplished to
a passable customary. Consideration to
the presentation is given however might not
be well-executed.
All required parts of a enterprise
report are current and accomplished to
a excessive customary. The doc is
offered in a professional-looking
doc, utilizing informative
headings and figures/tables the place
acceptable.
Use of references
(max marks = 5).
Many of the references are from
sources which have unsure reliability;
few if any acceptable citations are
offered.
Professionally official references
are usually used; clear and truthful
citations are offered most often;
a lot of the
data/content material/proof comes
from sources which might be dependable.
Presents compelling proof from
professionally official sources;
attribution is evident and correct;
references are from authorized
sources.

Check Price | Discount

Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Top Essay Writers

We select the finest writers to join our team. They each have expertise in specific topic fields and background in academic writing.

Affordable Prices

We offer the lowest possible pricing while still providing the best writers. Our costs are fair and reasonable compared to other writing services.

100% Plagiarism-Free

You will never receive a product that contains any plagiarism. We scan every final draft before releasing it to be delivered to a customer.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Assessment Brief Task Help, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.