Write My Paper!

Don't Stress over approaching deadlines; an able team is ready 24/7 to assist you with your coursework assignments

We provide study solutions in all subjects. Students are matched with specialists in the various fields; Masters level graduates experts.

Place an Order today with us and live to tell a success story! No Lateness!!

Special offer! Get 20 - 30% discount on all orders - Check Coupons Section

Posted: February 1st, 2022

OGBH 201: Organisational Behaviour Assignment

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
COURSE: Bachelor of Enterprise/Bachelor of Accounting
Unit Code: OGBH 201
Unit Title: Organisational Behaviour
Kind of Evaluation: Undertaking 2 – Group Oral Presentation and Group Report
Size/Period: Group Presentation: 2 audio system, Eight-10 lecture slides, 15 minutes to current. Group report : 2000 phrases
Unit Studying Outcomes addressed: 1.Interpret and describe the up to date theoretical frameworks and ideas of organisational behaviour;
2.Analyse and description several types of human behaviour within the office;
Three.Assess how an evidence-based strategy will be utilized to interpret administration and organisational behaviour;
four.Implement private and interpersonal expertise and information to handle oneself and others successfully in an organisational context;
5.Analyse the significance of teamwork and critically consider the strategies that can be utilized to develop efficient groups;
6. Hypothesise organisational issues and develop methods to resolve them.
Submission Date: Weeks 10 to 12 within the tutorials.
The Group Report and the slides for the Group presentation are to be submitted in mushy copy in Moodle in Week 10.
Evaluation Activity: Every group is required to organize and current a 15-minutes presentation on a subject as listed within the evaluation description. The scholars are required to undertake intensive desk analysis to discover the difficulty. A Group Report on the duty (inside 2000 phrases) and the presentation slides ought to be submitted in Moodle in Week 9 in addition to a tough copy to be handed to the lecturer in school earlier than presentation.
Complete Mark: Group Presentation – 20 Group Report – 40
Weighting: 60%
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 1 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

College students are suggested that submission of an Evaluation Activity previous the due date with out a formally
signed accredited Project Extension Type (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink FORM–Project
Extension Utility Type–Pupil LoginRequired) or beforehand accredited utility for different
extenuating circumstances impacting course of research, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated by deduction from the full mark.
For instance. An AssessmentTask marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for eachcalendar day.
Extra info, please check with (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink POLICY – Evaluation Coverage &
Procedures– Pupil Login Required)
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
Working in a gaggle of Three-5 college students, you’ll give a 15 minutes oral presentation. All group members should current their half as per the group constitution. Failure to current will result in zero for presentation a part of this activity. The softcopy of the presentation slides, a written Group Report (inside 2000 phrases) and different supporting supplies (if any) are to be uploaded within the Moodle on due date in addition to a tough copy to be handed to the lecturer in school on the day of presentation.
College students are required to determine and analysis into any enterprise particular person which has an excellent affect as a pacesetter within the enterprise world. The chief might have provided a brand new product, uncover one thing new, main a profitable enterprise, make the purchasers joyful or taking dangers and so on. As soon as the enterprise chief has been chosen, every Group can cowl any three (Three) to 5 (5) matters specializing in the chief (relying on the variety of members in every group. Every Member should cowl one subject). The instructed matters under as a part of the presentation as follows:
1) Essential choice (s) the chief has made
2) Sources of drawing inspiration or concepts from
Three) Coping with managers and staff
four) Visions the chief has for the organisation
5) Challenges the chief has to confronted
6) Strengths and weak spot of the chief
7) The dangers the chief has undertaken
Eight) Lesson(s) we are able to study this particular person as a pacesetter
9) Sources/space for leaders to seek out staff for its organisation Word: Each particular person within the group will get the identical mark for the report.
Getting began
a) Choose the chief that you just intent to analysis into,
b) E book an in-class presentation time with the lecturer (could also be preannounced),
c) Accumulate the knowledge of your subject by means of desk analysis,
d) Current at the very least 10 photos to be fashioned into slides for the presentation,
e) Put together the presentation slide and presentation abstract,
f) Rehearse the presentation in entrance of your mates and households or different group member,
g) Add the presentation, presentation abstract and supporting supplies (if any) on due date,
h) Make the presentation within the class.
In case you are absent from class at your presentation time, you’ll get zero for this evaluation, except you’ve got a medical certificates or different extenuating circumstances. Please discuss to your lecturer earlier than the due date.
There might be, ideally, four to five audio system, Eight-10 slides and an allotted 15 minutes to current.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 2 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

The Group Report on the duty (inside 2000 phrases) and the presentation slides ought to be submitted in Moodle in Week 9.
Use PowerPoint to create the presentation, reserve it on a USB so you might be able to current in school. A tough copy of the PowerPoints should even be given to the category tutor on the day of the presentation, and should even be submitted by means of Moodle on the due date. A press release have to be included on the Title Web page stating the agreed % contribution of every group member.
Educational Studying Expertise workers will give a workshop in school about Oral Displays, which might be very useful for this evaluation.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
This evaluation is a gaggle exercise and college students are required to work with their respective teams. No particular person submission might be accepted. Displays might be organised on a pre-arranged time between week 9 and 11. You’ll not obtain any marks if you’re absent in your scheduled presentation time. Nevertheless, consideration could also be provided solely beneath medical floor or different extenuating circumstances. You could present applicable supporting paper for consideration.
You’ll not obtain any marks for this project in case your group members collectively report towards you for non-participation or non-cooperation. It’s a must to nominate somebody as your group chief to coordinate the project submission.
Presentation slides, written abstract, and supporting supplies have to be submitted on-line in Moodle on due date in addition to a tough copy to be introduced to the lecturer in school. All supplies MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Workplace format. Different codecs might not be readable by markers. Please remember that any assessments submitted in different codecs might be thought of LATE and can lose marks till it’s introduced in Microsoft Workplace format.
No paper primarily based or hardcopy submission might be accepted.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page Three of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): Oral Presentation Rubric
Pupil Title Pupil ID
Components %age Exemplary (1 level) Acceptable (zero.6 level) Unacceptable (zero.Three level) Factors
1 zero.6 zero.Three
Opening assertion with objective 10% Clear opening
assertion, presenting
problem and organisation
for speech,
imaginative – catches
viewers’s curiosity A gap assertion
that states to key problem
and speech organisation No opening assertion,
or opening remarks that
don’t state the difficulty
Organisation 10% Clear organisation,
bolstered by media.
Stays centered
all through Largely organized, however
loses focus a couple of times Loses focus Three or extra
instances throughout
presentation
Content material: foreign money & relevance 10% Analysis goes past
minimal
necessities. Robust
evaluation Fulfils project
necessities. Present.
Makes use of applicable
sources and is goal.
Affordable evaluation. Doesn’t meet
project
necessities, isn’t
present, nor goal.
Doesn’t use applicable
evaluation.
High quality of slides 10% Readable,
skilled,
imaginative and/or of
top quality (with out
being a distraction) Readable, skilled,
applicable quantity Sloppy and/or unprofessional. Could also be tough to learn. Many slides are superfluous
High quality of conclusion 10% Exact conclusion,
nicely organized, give
good
suggestion Affordable conclusion,
semi organized, few
suggestion Irrelevant conclusion,
disorganized, no
suggestion
Voice high quality, tempo 10% Talking
appropriately, clear
and sharp voice,
regular quantity, price
and high quality Common in selecting
phrases, quantity and price Talking inappropriately, weak voice, too gradual
Mannerisms 10% Glorious use of
fingers, arms, physique,
and eye contact Reasonable use of fingers,
arms, physique, and eye
contact Poor utilization of fingers,
arms, physique, and eye
contact
Supply of contents 10% Talk
successfully and clarify
extra than simply
studying slides Common in explaining Simply studying slides extra
than clarification
Time 10% Applicable size of
presentation. Time is
appropriately used Time is appropriately
used, however might run
barely over or beneath
allotted time Time isn’t appropriately
used. Too lengthy or too
brief; or extra minutes
above or under the
allotted time
Potential to reply questions 10% Handles all questions
with related, appropriate
info Solutions 80% or extra of
questions, however doesn’t
develop on solutions Unable to reply 25% or
extra of questions with
appropriate info
TOTAL POINTS
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page four of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051
Group Report Rubric
Pupil Title Pupil ID
Components %age Exemplary
(Three.75 factors) Acceptable (2.25 factors) Unacceptable
(1.25 factors) Factors
Three.75 2.25 1.25
Content material 25% The assigned activity is completely coated and accomplished. The first thesis is obvious and absolutely developed. Assertions made all through the writing are compelling and clearly supported. The assigned activity is roofed sufficiently. The first thesis is obvious however there may be some room for additional growth of the subject. Assist is obtainable for assertions which can be made however that help could possibly be stronger, extra compelling or extra inclusive of all points Doesn’t adequately cowl the assigned activity. The first thesis might not be clear or whether it is, little subject growth is clear. Assertions made within the writing are both weakly supported or no help is obtainable.
Organisation 25% Paper flows nicely with applicable starting, growth, and conclusion. Paragraph construction contributes to circulation and transitions. Organisation and /or headings assist the reader to know and keep in mind info. Paper follows logical sequence with identifiable starting, growth, and conclusion. Typically correct use of paragraph construction and subject sentences. Organisation and /or headings assist the reader to observe and discover info. Paper lacks logical sequence therefore inflicting format to intrude with readability. Doesn’t use correct paragraphing. Matter sentences don’t result in remainder of paragraph or are lacking altogether.
Mechanics 25% No errors in phrase utilization, sentence construction (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Robust mechanics assist to ascertain credibility. Comparatively freed from errors in phrase utilization, sentence construction (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Mechanics don’t detract from credibility of the content material. Vital errors in phrase utilization, sentence construction (run-ons, fragments), spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization. Errors undermine
credibility of content material and readability.
Referencing 25% References (if known as for) are constantly appropriate utilizing Harvard model. No lacking citations. Typically appropriate referencing (if known as for) Harvard model. Some lacking citations. References/ citations (if known as for) are lacking or don’t use appropriate referencing model.
TOTAL POINTS
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 5 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content material for Evaluation Activity papers ought to incorporate a proper introduction, details and conclusion.
Applicable educational writing and referencing are inevitable educational expertise that you have to develop and exhibit in work being introduced for evaluation. The content material of top quality work introduced by a scholar have to be absolutely referenced within-text citations and a Reference Record on the finish. Kent strongly recommends you check with the Educational Studying Assist Workshop supplies accessible on the Kent Studying Administration System
(Moodle). For particulars please click on the hyperlink
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606and obtain the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Website is the situation for Workbooks and data which can be introduced to Kent College students within the ALS Workshops performed initially of every Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimal of FIVE(5)references in work being introduced for evaluation. Except in any other case particularly instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed within the Unit Define for the precise Evaluation Activity, any paper with lower than 5 (5)references could also be deemed not assembly a passable normal and presumably be failed.
Content material in Evaluation duties that features sources that aren’t correctly referenced in line with the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” might be penalised.
Marks might be deducted for failure to stick to the phrase rely if that is particularly said for the Evaluation Activity within the Unit Define. As a common rule there may be an allowable discretionary variance to the phrase rely in that it’s typically accepted that a scholar might go over or beneath by 10% than the said size.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for his or her high quality. College students ought to draw on high quality educational sources, comparable to books, chapters from edited books, journals and so on. The textbook for the Unit of research can be utilized as a reference, however not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will wish to see proof that a scholar is able to conducting their very own analysis. Additionally, with a view to assist Assessors decide a scholar’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not simply direct quotes) should embrace the precise web page quantity(s) if proven within the authentic. Earlier than making ready your Evaluation Activity or personal contribution, please evaluate this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism by means of Referencing) by clicking on the next hyperlink:hyperlink:http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A seek for peer-reviewed journal articles might also help college students. These sort of journal articles will be positioned within the on-line journal databases and will be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, on-line dictionaries and on-line encyclopaedias are acceptable as a place to begin to achieve information a couple of subject, however shouldn’t be over-used – these ought to represent not more than 10% of your complete record of references/sources. Further info and literature can be utilized the place these are produced by professional sources, comparable to authorities departments, analysis institutes such because the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council(NHMRC), or worldwide organisations such because the World Well being Organisation (WHO). Authentic organisations and authorities departments produce peer reviewed experiences and articles and are subsequently very helpful and principally very present. The content material of the next hyperlink explains why it isn’t acceptable to make use of non-peer reviewed web sites(Why cannot I simply Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw
(thanks to La Trobe College for entry to this video).
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Temporary ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 6 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

Check Price | Discount

Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Top Essay Writers

We select the finest writers to join our team. They each have expertise in specific topic fields and background in academic writing.

Affordable Prices

We offer the lowest possible pricing while still providing the best writers. Our costs are fair and reasonable compared to other writing services.

100% Plagiarism-Free

You will never receive a product that contains any plagiarism. We scan every final draft before releasing it to be delivered to a customer.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Assessment Brief Task Help, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.