COURSE: Bachelor of IT / Bachelor of Accounting / Bachelor of Enterprise
Unit: IT for Enterprise Organisations
Unit Code: ITBO201
Sort of Evaluation: Evaluation 2 – Content material Evaluation (Reflective Journal)
Size/Period: three,500 phrases
Outcomes addressed: Upon profitable completion of this unit college students ought to be capable to:
1. Perceive the core rules and ideas of data programs.
2. Describe enterprise processes and the way info programs can be utilized to enhance these processes and contribute to enterprise resolution making.
Evaluation Job: College students are required to analyse the weekly lecture materials of weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content material evaluation summaries of the theoretical ideas contained within the course lecture slides.
60% of the unit complete marks
College students are suggested that submission of an Evaluation Job previous the due date with out a formally signed authorized Task Extension Type (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink FORM – Task
Extension Utility Type – Pupil Login Required) or beforehand authorized utility for different extenuating circumstances impacting course of examine, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated by deduction from the overall mark.
For instance. An Evaluation Job marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for every calendar day.
Extra info, please discuss with (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink POLICY – Evaluation Coverage &
Procedures – Pupil Login Required)
College students are required to analyse the weekly lecture materials of weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content material evaluation summaries of the theoretical ideas contained within the course lecture slides.
The place the lab content material or info contained in technical articles from the Web or books helps to completely describe the lecture slide content material, dialogue of such theoretical articles or dialogue of the lab materials needs to be included within the content material evaluation.
The doc construction is as follows (3500 Phrases):
1. Title Web page
2. Introduction (350 phrases)
three. Background (350 phrases)
four. Content material evaluation (reflective journals) for every week from 1 to 11 (2750 phrases; 250 phrases per week):
a. Theoretical Dialogue
i. Necessary subjects coated
b. Interpretations of the contents
i. What are a very powerful/helpful/related details about the content material? c. Final result
i. What have I realized from this?
5. Conclusion (50 phrases)
Your report should embody:
• Not less than 5 references, out of which, three references have to be from tutorial sources.
• Harvard Australian referencing for any sources you utilize.
• Consult with the Tutorial Studying Expertise scholar information on Referencing.
This task needs to be submitted on-line in Moodle by way of Turnitin.
The task MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Phrase format. Different codecs might not be readable by markers. Please bear in mind that any assessments submitted in different codecs will probably be thought of LATE and can lose marks till it’s introduced in Phrase.
For help please communicate to our Tutorial Studying Expertise Coordinators, in Sydney (firstname.lastname@example.org) or in Melbourne (email@example.com). They may also help you with understanding the duty, draft checking, construction, referencing and different assignment-related issues.
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content material for Evaluation Job papers ought to incorporate a proper introduction, details and conclusion.
Applicable tutorial writing and referencing are inevitable tutorial expertise that you will need to develop and display in work being introduced for evaluation. The content material of top quality work introduced by a scholar have to be totally referenced within-text citations and a Reference Listing on the finish. Kent strongly recommends you discuss with the Tutorial Studying Assist Workshop supplies obtainable on the Kent Studying Administration System (Moodle). For particulars please click on the hyperlink http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and obtain the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Web site is the situation for Workbooks and knowledge which might be introduced to Kent College students within the ALS Workshops carried out firstly of every Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimal of FIVE (5) references in work being introduced for evaluation. Until in any other case particularly instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed within the Unit Define for the precise Evaluation Job, any paper with lower than 5 (5) references could also be deemed not assembly a passable normal and probably be failed.
Content material in Evaluation duties that features sources that aren’t correctly referenced in keeping with the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will probably be penalised.
Marks will probably be deducted for failure to stick to the phrase rely if that is particularly said for the Evaluation Job within the Unit Define. As a normal rule there’s an allowable discretionary variance to the phrase rely in that it’s usually accepted scholar could go over or beneath by 10% than the said size.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for his or her high quality. College students ought to draw on high quality tutorial sources, akin to books, chapters from edited books, journals and many others. The textbook for the Unit of examine can be utilized as a reference, however not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will need to see proof scholar is able to conducting their very own analysis. Additionally, as a way to assist Assessors decide a scholar’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not simply direct quotes) should embody the precise web page quantity(s) if proven within the unique. Earlier than getting ready your Evaluation Job or personal contribution, please evaluation this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism by way of Referencing) by clicking on the next hyperlink: hyperlink: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A seek for peer-reviewed journal articles may additionally help college students. These kind of journal articles will be situated within the on-line journal databases and will be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, on-line dictionaries and on-line encyclopaedias are acceptable as a place to begin to achieve data a few subject, however shouldn’t be over-used – these ought to represent not more than 10% of your complete checklist of references/sources. Extra info and literature can be utilized the place these are produced by authentic sources, akin to authorities departments, analysis institutes such because the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council (NHMRC), or worldwide organisations such because the World Well being Organisation (WHO). Authentic organisations and authorities departments produce peer reviewed reviews and articles and are subsequently very helpful and principally very present. The content material of the next hyperlink explains why it’s not acceptable to make use of non-peer reviewed web sites (Why cannot I
simply Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (Thanks to La Trobe College for entry to this video).
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
Your solutions for the ultimate examination questions will probably be assessed as per the next marking standards. Please learn rigorously every part/degree and marks weightage.
Marking Standards Marks
Content material exactly introduced based mostly on references 50 Marks
Presentation (Format, no grammatical errors, reads nicely, and many others.) 5 Marks
Cited references 5 Marks
Complete marks for content material evaluation task 60 Marks