Assessment – DevOps Pipeline
Assessment Number 1
Assessment Type (and weighting) Portfolio Assessment (40%)
As a group design, document and deploy appropriate solutions to the problem brief
Assessment Name DevOps PipelIne
Assessment Submission Date In class, week commencing 04th May 2020
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
1 Evaluate the literature on development and operations within the context of infrastructure management, deployment and automation.
2 Critically Analyse various tools and techniques used in the field of DevOps including the management of appropriate technologies.
3 Develop appropriate theoretical underpinnings to the approaches used within the DevOps environment/culture
4 Apply approaches used in the continuous integration.
5 Implement appropriate technical outcomes that meet the requirements of the brief and based upon research.
Assessment Brief
You will be given a technical specification and an existing code base for a web-based application. You are to be assessed on your ability to individually research appropriate processes and technologies surrounding DevOps and then, as a group, implement an appropriate solution. In terms of the development of the code, it is not expected (but hoped) that you will finish the application but in order to successfully demonstrate the implementation of your DevOps lifecycle it is expected that you will update and deploy the applications using solution as identified by your group. You will be summativly assessed on the individual research, group development, implementation and use of the DevOps Pipeline solution.
As this assessment is portfolio based (No Exams) you will be required to make a number of submissions and undertake a number of tasks – each of which contribute to the final portfolio of work.
There are 4 elements to this portfolio:
1) Research paper – Individual – Summative
2) Implementation Proposal – Group – Formative
3) Video Submission – Group – Summative
4) Peer Review – Individual – Summative
Research paper.
Equivalent of up to 50% portfolio mark
Learning outcomes assessed
LO1 Evaluate the literature on development and operations within the context of infrastructure management, deployment and automation.
LO2 Critically Analyse various tools and techniques used in the field of DevOps including the management of appropriate technologies.
LO3 Develop appropriate theoretical underpinnings to the approaches used within the DevOps environment/culture
ACME Developments is a software development house that is currently responsible for the development of web-based software Magister. Currently the ACME Development team have an SDLC as shown below in figure 1.0
Figure 1 ACME Developments Development Processes
You have been brought in as a Senior DevOps consultant. You have identified that this is this is a poorly implemented, irrational and separates the workflow of both the development and operations teams. As such the whole process requires significant investment and organisational development. There are immediate issues that need resolving and to help ease some of the pain and you have prioritised the following areas for research as part of the creation of an appropriate DevOps pipeline:
• DevOps Culture
• Development & Operations Processes
• Continuous Integration & Testing
• Configuration Management
• Automated deployment and monitoring solutions – as a blend of private and public cloud
Furthermore, your personal standing as a DevOps expert and academic researcher has been noted and the prestigious Journal of all things DevOps (JOATDO) have insisted that you write your findings as a research article. As such, you are to present this as an academic paper that meets the standards for publication in the JOATDO. The document will therefore have to contain in one form or another abstract, Introduction, Literature review/background, results, discussions and conclusion.
In addition, a supplementary self-assessment appendix is to be required. This appendix will contain your reflections upon how you approached the research task, what steps you feel you could have improved upon and based upon the HE7 marking criteria what grade you objectively give the work.
Have a look at https://thescipub.com/journals/jcs/instructions for some indications of what should be in a computer science paper. Also note that the template that is available on this site and in Moodle MUST be used.
Pass mark, Expectations and Marking criteria
This is a master’s level HE7 assignment and the minimum pass mark for an assessment is 50%. As such the expectations upon the levels of critical analysis and thinking are greater than what you may have been used to at undergraduate level.
It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include 6-7 refereed academic journals and five academic/technical books/white papers. You will be graded upon ALL aspects of the General Marking criteria for HE7 work which can be found in the Module guide. I recommend that you review that
Group Proposal
Equivalent of 5% portfolio mark
Part of the implementation strategy at ACME Developments you are required to deliver a proposal to the Technical Director in the form of a PowerPoint/Prezi presentation. It is expected that you will use the research undertaken to develop a coherent manageable and compatible set of processes and tools across the entire end-to-end DevOps ‘cycle’. Thus, the presentation must include, but is not limited to, the Agile project development processes, continuous-* across the Dev, QA, and User Acceptance Testing and deployment pipelines. This is in addition to providing processes on systems reporting and monitoring processes.
You are to also consider the actual technical implementation of the tools needed. This is to include technical specifications of:
• hardware requirements – physical and virtual, including costs
• software requirements – versions, licences (Open source/proprietary) and costs
• Additional requirements needed to implement the Agile development processes and associated communications/project management.
• Roles and responsibilities of team members including potential wage costs
• Proposed overall budget
This proposal briefing will be no more than 10 mins and no less than 5. Marks will be awarded for the technical feasibility of the pipelines as well as the interoperability between hardware, dev and ops processes. Helpful resource to get an overview https://www.atlassian.com/agile/devops
Video Log/Demonstration:
Equivalent of 30% portfolio mark
Learning outcomes assessed
LO4 Apply approaches used in the continuous integration.
LO5 Implement appropriate technical outcomes that meet the requirements of the brief and based upon research
The final aspect of the submission is the creation of a video that demonstrates the proposed pipeline in action. It is also expected that as a team you will vlog the processes of development as you go highlighting technical issues and how you resolved them. You will, as a team discuss in the context of your roles your involvement in the processes and how each of the stages ‘hands off’ and communications with the other. In addition you MUST provide a bibliography of all sources used in the development and implementation of the solution. This will be deployed onto the website as an appropriate menu item from the home page.
This video is to be no more than 30 mins long and each member of the team must contribute.
Peer review.
Equivalent to +/- 15% Portfolio mark
Each student within a group must assess their colleagues by awarding a mark based on their perceived effort for working as part of the team. You will not be asked to provide a mark for yourself.
This will be carried out by providing either a positive or negative value based upon the criteria given in the table below. The results for an individual will be the sum of the marks given by each team member which will then be applied to the overall mark from the tutor for the presentation.
For example, if there are 6 in a team an individual will be given 5 contributing points. These will be averaged of marks and then multiplied by 20 to give a maximum out of 100 (negative results are allowed) and then weighted at 15% of the overall assessment mark for the group work. So, if you score an over all of -70 this will remove 15 marks from your group work mark likewise a mark of + 70 will result in an additional 15 marks over all
Use the table below as a guide to providing the assessment mark for each of your colleagues in the group based upon what you believe to be their performance contribution. You must assess each of your colleagues individually and you cannot give the same value more than once, each member of your group must be awarded a unique mark.
Peer mark awarded Perceived effort and contribution to the team
+5 Considerable effort put into the teamwork, contributed significantly more than the other team members.
+3 Above average effort put into the teamwork, contributed more than the other team members.
+1 Average effort put into the teamwork, contributed on an equal level to the other team members.
-1 Just below average effort put into the teamwork, did not contribute as much as other team members.
-3 Well below average effort put into the teamwork, little contribution to teamwork.
-5 No effort put into the teamwork, no contribution to team work.
Student Name _______________________________ Mark Given ______________
Student Name _______________________________ Mark Given ______________
Student Name _______________________________ Mark Given ______________
Student Name _______________________________ Mark Given ______________
Place an Order Now & Get These Add-on Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
